Flood Damages in an Infrastructure Climate Risk Stress Test: A Case Study of a Solar Power Plant Project

Muhammad Dafa Sultan Pasha; Gan Gan Dirgantara; Sandi Krisna Wiliandi; Endi Trimawan Budianto

doi:10.35166/jipm.v8i2.137

Authors

Muhammad Dafa Sultan Pasha PT SMI
Gan Gan Dirgantara PT SMI
Sandi Krisna Wiliandi PT SMI
Endi Trimawan Budianto PT SMI

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35166/jipm.v8i2.137

Keywords:

Flood Damage, Climate Risk Stress Test, Infrastructure Finance, Vulnerability Assessment

Abstract

Climate change presents significant risks not only to the environment but also to financial systems. In response, climate risk stress testing (CRST) has become an important tool for regulators and financial institutions. However, most applications of CRST to date have focused on real estate and mortgage exposures, with little attention given to infrastructure assets. This paper addresses that gap by exploring methodologies to analyze flood-related physical risk for infrastructure in the context of CRST. The study applies the hazard–vulnerability–exposure approach by combining global flood hazard data from the Aqueduct tools, depth-damage functions, and simplified assumptions on asset exposure. A case study on an anonymized solar power plant project in Indonesia is conducted to demonstrate the methodology. The analysis produces estimates of financial loss using both single-event damage and Expected Annual Damage (EAD), which can then be integrated into project-level financial stress tests. The results show that this framework provides a practical and transparent way to quantify climate-induced flood risk for infrastructure, offering a starting point for regulators, development finance institutions, and multilateral development banks. At the same time, several weaknesses are identified, including the coarse resolution of global hazard maps, generic vulnerability functions are not calibrated for local conditions, and the absence of considerations for flood protection and indirect financial impacts.

Author Biography

Gan Gan Dirgantara, PT SMI

Head of Environment, Social and Technical Evaluation Division

References

Assab, A. (2025). Did we open the flood gates? Climate risk and infrastructure loans probability of default. Journal of Climate Finance, 11, 100066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclimf.2025.100066

Auzepy, A., & Bannier, C. E. (2025). Integrating Climate Risks in Bank Risk Management and Capital Requirements. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-47061-6

Bank Negara Malaysia. (2024). 2024 Climate Risk Stress Testing Exercise: Methodology Paper.

Bank of England. (2022). Results of the 2021 Climate Biennial Exploratory Scenario.

Becher, O., Pant, R., Verschuur, J., Mandal, A., Paltan, H., Lawless, M., Raven, E., & Hall, J. (2023). A multi‐hazard risk framework to stress‐test water supply systems to climate‐related disruptions. Earth’s Future, 11(1), e2022EF002946. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022EF002946

Boros, E. (2020). Risks of climate change and credit institution stress tests. Financial and Economic Review, 19(4), 107–131. https://doi.org/10.33893/FER.19.4.107131

Caloia, F., & Jansen, D.-J. (2021). Flood risk and financial stability: Evidence from a stress test for the Netherlands. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3961290

Dawson, R. J., Thompson, D., Johns, D., Wood, R., Darch, G., Chapman, L., Hughes, P. N., Watson, G. V. R., Paulson, K., Bell, S., Gosling, S. N., Powrie, W., & Hall, J. W. (2018). A systems framework for national assessment of climate risks to infrastructure. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical, and Engineering Sciences, 376(2121), 20170298. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2017.0298

Field, C. B., Barros, V., Stocker, T. F., & Dahe, Q. (Eds.). (2012). Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation: Special Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/ CBO9781139177245

Hong Kong Monetary Authority. (2021). Pilot Banking Sector Climate Risk Stress Test.

Huizinga, J., De Moel, H., & Szewczyk, W. (2017). Global flood depth-damage functions: Methodology and the database with guidelines. JRC European Commission. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2760/ 16510

Kondrup, C., Mercogliano, P., Bosello, F., Mysiak, J., Scoccimarro, E., Rizzo, A., Ebrey, R., Ruiter, M. D., Jeuken, A., & Watkiss, P. (Eds.). (2022). Climate Adaptation Modelling. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86211-4

Krijgsman, J. (2021). Assessing Climate-Related Flood Risk for Climate Adaptation in the Financial Sector: A Risk Assessment Framework for Future Flood Risk to Real-Estate.

Mühlhofer, E., Bresch, D. N., & Koks, E. E. (2024). Infrastructure failure cascades quintuple risk of storm and flood-induced service disruptions across the globe. One Earth, 7(4), 714–729. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.oneear.2024.03.010

Netto, M., Pereira Porto, R., Trabacchi, C., Schneider, S., Harb, S., & Smallridge, D. (2021). A Guidebook for National Development Banks on Climate Risk. Inter-American Development Bank. https://doi.org/10.18235/0003357

OJK. (2024a). Buku 1 Panduan Umum Climate Risk Management & Scenario Analysis (CRMS) Perbankan.

OJK. (2024b). Buku 2 Panduan Teknis Climate Risk Management and Scenario Analysis Perbankan.

Ranger, N. A., Mahul, O., & Monasterolo, I. (2022). Assessing Financial Risks from Physical Climate Shocks. World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/37041

Reinders, H. J., Schoenmaker, D., & Van Dijk, M. (2023). A finance approach to climate stress testing. Journal of International Money and Finance, 131, 102797. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.jimonfin.2022.102797

Schwab, A., Walker, A., & Desai, J. (2020). Insurance in the Operation of Photovoltaic Plants (No. NREL/TP--6A20-78588, 1755719, MainId:32505; p. NREL/TP--6A20-78588, 1755719, MainId:32505). https://doi.org/10.2172/1755719

Silva, K., Janta, P., & Chollacoop, N. (2021). Points of consideration on climate adaptation of solar power plants in Thailand: How climate change affects site selection, construction, and operation. Energies, 15(1), 171. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15010171

Slager, K., & Wagenaar, D. (2017). Standaardmethode 2017 – Schade en slachtoffers als gevolg van overstromingen.

UNEP. (2024). A Comprehensive Review of Global Supervisory Climate Stress Tests.

Ward, P. J., Winsemius, H. C., Kuzma, S., Bierkens, M. F. P., Bouwman, A., Moel, H. D., Loaiza, A. D., Englhardt, J., Erkens, G., Gebremedhin, E. T., Iceland, C., Kooi, H., Ligtvoet, W., Muis, S., Scussolini, P., Sutanudjaja, E. H., Beek, R. V., Bemmel, B. V., Huijstee, J. V., … Luo, T. (2020). Technical Note: Aqueduct Floods Methodology.

Wobus, C., Zheng, P., Stein, J., Lay, C., Mahoney, H., Lorie, M., Mills, D., Spies, R., Szafranski, B., & Martinich, J. (2019). Projecting changes in expected annual damages from riverine flooding in the United States. Earth’s Future, 7(5), 516–527. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018EF001119

Wu, S.-H., Chiang, C.-L., Huang, Y.-H., Huang, J., Tsao, J.-H., & Tung, C.-P. (2024). Climate risk assessment framework in real estate: A focus on flooding. Sustainability, 16(21), 9577. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16219577